Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Background agents do not work for real development, because steering a…
17 connected korrents · 15 moments on record from 2 Jun 2024 to 3 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under coding agents
coding agents
Everything filed under Anthropic
Anthropic
Everything filed under MCP
MCP
Everything filed under Ruby on Rails
Ruby on Rails
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Cannot both be true Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: Background agents do not work for real development, because steering a model as it drifts is the job, and you cannot steer what you are not watching.
Background agents do not work for real development, because steering a model as it drifts is the job, and you cannot steer what you are not watching.
Last stated a year ago
25 Aug 2025
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2025-08-25 — tap for who they are
Cannot both be true: The scarce skill is now context switching across parallel agents, not sustained deep work. — tap to centre the map on it
The scarce skill is now context switching across parallel agents, not sustained deep work.
Last stated 6 months ago
4 Mar 2026
BC
Boris Cherny — holds since 2026-03-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks. — tap to centre the map on it
The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks.
Last stated 2 months ago
19 Jul 2026
ES
Elizabeth Stone — holds since 2026-07-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: What limits you with coding agents is your own skill at stringing them together, not the capability of the models. — tap to centre the map on it
What limits you with coding agents is your own skill at stringing them together, not the capability of the models.
Last stated 6 months ago
20 Mar 2026
AK
Andrej Karpathy — holds since 2026-03-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Long-running agents fail because they drift off the distribution they were trained on, and degrade further the farther out they get. — tap to centre the map on it
Long-running agents fail because they drift off the distribution they were trained on, and degrade further the farther out they get.
Last stated a month ago
30 Jul 2026
JD
Jeff Dean — holds since 2026-07-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on.
Last stated 4 days ago
3 Sept 2026
DR
Dax Raad — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The frightening part of giving agents more access is not bad code but irreversible action, so the guardrails to build next are guardrails on reversibility. — tap to centre the map on it
The frightening part of giving agents more access is not bad code but irreversible action, so the guardrails to build next are guardrails on reversibility.
Last stated 5 months ago
29 Mar 2026
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2026-03-29 — tap for who they are
Same subject: When an AI agent runs out of forward progress, throw the project away and start over rather than trying to tweak it. — tap to centre the map on it
When an AI agent runs out of forward progress, throw the project away and start over rather than trying to tweak it.
Last stated 2 months ago
1 Jul 2026
KB
Kent Beck — holds since 2026-07-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agents can already be run for days or weeks on a single hard problem, and almost nobody has internalised that. — tap to centre the map on it
Agents can already be run for days or weeks on a single hard problem, and almost nobody has internalised that.
Last stated a month ago
30 Jul 2026
JD
Jeff Dean — holds since 2026-07-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The workable model right now is one super agent for a whole company, not a personal agent for every person. — tap to centre the map on it
The workable model right now is one super agent for a whole company, not a personal agent for every person.
Last stated 3 months ago
24 May 2026
DS
Dan Shipper — holds since 2026-05-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year. — tap to centre the map on it
A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year.
Last stated 4 days ago
3 Sept 2026
DR
Dax Raad — holds since 2026-09-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces. — tap to centre the map on it
A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces.
Last stated 5 days ago
2 Sept 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-09-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares. — tap to centre the map on it
A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares.
Last stated 4 months ago
10 May 2026
ER
Eric Ries — holds since 2026-05-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context. — tap to centre the map on it
Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context.
Last stated 7 months ago
12 Feb 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-02-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: MCP is not a new foundation for anything — it is API design, and Kubernetes was already turning one intention into seven calls a decade ago. — tap to centre the map on it
MCP is not a new foundation for anything — it is API design, and Kubernetes was already turning one intention into seven calls a decade ago.
Last stated 3 months ago
3 Jun 2026
KH
Kelsey Hightower — holds since 2026-06-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked. — tap to centre the map on it
MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked.
Last stated a year ago
25 Aug 2025
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2025-08-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Calling static typing the only way to build reliable systems is idiotic in the face of the evidence, starting with Shopify serving a million requests a second on Rails. — tap to centre the map on it
Calling static typing the only way to build reliable systems is idiotic in the face of the evidence, starting with Shopify serving a million requests a second on Rails.
Last stated a year ago
12 Jul 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-07-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Ruby on Rails took off because its creator evangelized it by arguing its superiority against the competing alternatives. — tap to centre the map on it
Ruby on Rails took off because its creator evangelized it by arguing its superiority against the competing alternatives.
Last stated 2 years ago
2 Jun 2024
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — no longer holds since 2024-06-02 — tap for who they are
cannot both be true same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2015 to today — full is today a face: someone on record holding the claim — tap it for who they are faded, dashed ring: they no longer hold it — they changed their mind
At the centre
Background agents do not work for real development, because steering a model as it drifts is the job, and you cannot steer what you are not watching.
Last stated 25 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Peter Steinberger
Read this korrent →
Cannot both be true
The scarce skill is now context switching across parallel agents, not sustained deep work.
Last stated 4 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Boris Cherny
Similar wording
The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks.
Last stated 19 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds ES Elizabeth Stone
Similar wording
What limits you with coding agents is your own skill at stringing them together, not the capability of the models.
Last stated 20 Mar 2026 · 6 months ago
Holds Andrej Karpathy
Similar wording
Long-running agents fail because they drift off the distribution they were trained on, and degrade further the farther out they get.
Last stated 30 Jul 2026 · a month ago
Holds JD Jeff Dean
Similar wording
A coding-agent company should not train its own model: it has to stay neutral ground for models to compete on.
Last stated 3 Sept 2026 · 4 days ago
Holds Dax Raad
Similar wording
The frightening part of giving agents more access is not bad code but irreversible action, so the guardrails to build next are guardrails on reversibility.
Last stated 29 Mar 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds CH Chip Huyen
Similar wording
When an AI agent runs out of forward progress, throw the project away and start over rather than trying to tweak it.
Last stated 1 Jul 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds KB Kent Beck
Similar wording
Agents can already be run for days or weeks on a single hard problem, and almost nobody has internalised that.
Last stated 30 Jul 2026 · a month ago
Holds JD Jeff Dean
Similar wording
The workable model right now is one super agent for a whole company, not a personal agent for every person.
Last stated 24 May 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds DS Dan Shipper
Same subject: Anthropic
A benchmark that ranks Claude Code last while it stays first in use is measuring the wrong thing, and has been for a year.
Last stated 3 Sept 2026 · 4 days ago
Holds Dax Raad
Same subject: Anthropic
A language model asked to summarize its own system prompt risks that prompt's content biasing the summary it produces.
Last stated 2 Sept 2026 · 5 days ago
Holds Simon Willison
Same subject: Anthropic
A trust that owns the mission protects a company better than founder control does, which is why Anthropic needs no dual-class shares.
Last stated 10 May 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds ER Eric Ries
Same subject: MCP
Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context.
Last stated 12 Feb 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Peter Steinberger
Same subject: MCP
MCP is not a new foundation for anything — it is API design, and Kubernetes was already turning one intention into seven calls a decade ago.
Last stated 3 Jun 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds KH Kelsey Hightower
Same subject: MCP
MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked.
Last stated 25 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Peter Steinberger
Same subject: Ruby on Rails
Calling static typing the only way to build reliable systems is idiotic in the face of the evidence, starting with Shopify serving a million requests a second on Rails.
Last stated 12 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds David Heinemeier Hansson
Same subject: Ruby on Rails
Ruby on Rails took off because its creator evangelized it by arguing its superiority against the competing alternatives.
Last stated 2 Jun 2024 · 2 years ago
No longer holds David Heinemeier Hansson