Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsPrompt engineering encourages gimmicky techniques like “you’re a senior software engineer” or “think for longer.” Context engineering is more durable
Their wordsThese are exciting but they all share a property most real software doesn't: a simple, verifiable success criterion. Real software requires a system that scales human taste and decision-making
Their wordsInterestingly, we found this technique to work best when the coding and review agents do not share any context beforehand.
Their wordsWe think the unstructured-swarm approach, arbitrary networks of agents negotiating with each other, is mostly a distraction.
Their wordsmulti-agent systems work best today when writes stay single-threaded and the additional agents contribute intelligence rather than actions
Their wordsThe open problems are all communication problems.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.