korrents

korrents · piece

How to pay professional maintainers

Filippo Valsorda · 17 Mar 2022

Others here said this too

A contribution is a cost to the maintainer, not a gift: it is taking part, not merely using the code, that consumes a project’s scarcest resource.

I often read advice along the lines of “if you want to help a project send PRs” and I never understood it. Reviewing and iterating or pushing back on PRs is work! Often more than writing the code itself.

Also said by Nadia Asparouhova

Read the piece on words.filippo.io ↗

4 korrents from this piece ↓

Filippo Valsorda did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. I often read advice along the lines of “if you want to help a project send PRs” and I never understood it. Reviewing and iterating or pushing back on PRs is work! Often more than writing the code itself.
  2. $1,000/month without benefits is a nice way to show appreciation, but won’t achieve any other goals.
  3. Governance is a delicate and complex topic, and you want to leave it as orthogonal as possible to funding.
  4. Finally, the health of the project depends on issue triage, bug fixes, refactors, and design work more than on new features. In fact, new features increase the maintenance burden.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.