korrents

korrents · books

The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, 1961)

Jane Jacobs · c. 1961

Read the book on archive.org ↗

1 person recommends it, on rcmnd ↗

10 korrents from this book ↓

Jane Jacobs did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this book, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The book prints chapter headings its extracted text does not preserve, so the claims below are in the book's order but not grouped. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody.
  2. Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings.
  3. Under the seeming disorder of the old city, wherever the old city is working successfully, is a marvelous order for maintaining the safety of the streets and the freedom of the city.
  4. Dull, inert cities, it is true, do contain the seeds of their own destruction and little else.
  5. A city cannot be a work of art.
  6. Streets and their sidewalks, the main public places of a city, are its most vital organs.
  7. The trust of a city street is formed over time from many, many little public sidewalk contacts.
  8. Cities are an immense laboratory of trial and error, failure and success, in city building and city design.
  9. To approach a city, or even a city neighborhood, as if it were a larger architectural problem, capable of being given order by converting it into a disciplined work of art, is to make the mistake of attempting to substitute art for life.
  10. A well-used city street is apt to be a safe street. A deserted city street is apt to be unsafe.

Related books

Found from what the books talk about: claims worded alike in the archive's hourly pass, and subjects both are filed under. It is not a judgement that they agree — related books often argue the opposite. All books

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.