korrents

korrents · piece

Daniela Amodei Says Curiosity Is Underrated (View From The Top, Stanford GSB; speaker-labelled transcript)

Daniela Amodei · 29 Jun 2026

Read the piece on gsb.stanford.edu ↗

9 korrents from this piece ↓

Daniela Amodei did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. this concept that the ability to be curious and learn, across a lot of disciplines. To have a strong foundation of wanting to have impact, regardless of the area that you’re working on, I think that’s an underrated quality.
  2. we’re running towards something, versus running away from something. We had this vision in our heads of wanting to create an organization where the values that matter to us around safety, around responsibility, were the kind of forefront of what we were doing.
  3. I think to us, the kind of highest level of framing, is just taking a form of radical responsibility for the technology that we’re developing.
  4. I think in general, the two don’t come into conflict as much as you would expect.
  5. AI is going to change what types of jobs are available and what types of jobs people do.
  6. ultimately, there’s this very real phenomenon, which is that humans like to be with other humans.
  7. I truly think following something that you really care about, something that you are passionate about, is the most important thing you can do.
  8. I think sensible regulation will need to be part of the story for artificial intelligence.
  9. I bluntly think people should hold companies accountable for using their data carefully, because it is very personal.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.