Read the piece on nothings.org ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
There should be no software patents, because a patent infringes on other people's freedoms.
Their wordsThe real reason we should not have software patents is because a patent infringes on other people's freedoms.
Our reading
Software is different from other patentable domains: adaptive, combinatorial, built for reuse.
Their wordsSoftware is different from most domains of patenting. Software is extremely adaptive and combinatorial.
Our reading
The patent system is broken, and the patent office is financially rewarded for keeping it broken.
Their wordsThe system is broke, and it seems the PTO is financially rewarded for keeping it broken.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.