Read the piece on feeds.hanselman.com ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsPeople should not be judging AI-augmented coding by "1 shots."
Our reading
Programming is essentially the craft of turning ambiguous ideas into precise, specific instructions.
Their wordsIt's not trivial to one shot something unique, because programming is the art of making the ambiguous incredibly specific through sculpting.
Their wordsAs high-level programming cedes way to the prose compiler, making your goals and specs well understood to the ambiguity loop and showing good judgment is going to matter more than ever.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.