korrents

korrents · piece

Jane Austen born 250 years ago today: a tragic Marxist feminist?

Paul Seabright · 16 Dec 2025

Read the piece on paulseabright.com ↗

6 korrents from this piece ↓

Paul Seabright did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Adam Smith’s waspish observations in Book 5 of The Wealth of Nations about the idleness of Anglican clergymen are stunningly corroborated by Jane Austen.
  2. E is the novel that comes out best from the close comparison with the others.
  3. P is badly plotted, with characters even more stereotyped than usual.
  4. Jane Austen’s view of the desirable qualities in a man is dominated by the importance of emotional faithfulness. Almost nothing else matters. Even kindness comes nowhere in comparison.
  5. Jane Austen is usually celebrated for mocking her most snobbish characters, but she is a serious snob herself.
  6. A summary of Jane Austen’s view of life might be that she is a courageously tragic Marxist feminist. Feminist because her female characters are more interesting than her male ones. Marxist because economic circumstances determine everything else: nobody can enjoy a worthwhile life without prosperity.

Keep reading