korrents

korrents · piece

AI and the Romantic Fallacy

Matt LeMay · 23 Jun 2026

Read the piece on mattlemay.beehiiv.com ↗

2 korrents from this piece ↓

Matt LeMay did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. In arenas where I don’t have long-standing skill and expertise, AI has undeniably made me more creative. But it’s also made me more impatient—and less (productively) critical. I find myself marveling at the things I’ve “made”, even if I have no idea how they were made at all. Stopping to think feels like slowing down. The sense of intrinsic reward that comes with creative work is there, but it rings shallow.
  2. Wordsworth’s romantic fallacy rhetorically erases the real friction that goes into creative work. AI erases it materially. And it’s exactly why newly minted creatives (myself, in the world of software development, very much included) are in for a rude awakening: the friction is what makes creative work interesting.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.