Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
Using psychiatric terms in a flippant, jokey way is hurtful to people who actually have depression.
Their wordseven the New York Times is now using psychiatric terms in a flippant, jokey way. I understand the counterargument here (it's just a bit of fun, it's fine for language to change) - but if I had depression right now, I'd hate to see stuff like this
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.