Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
Weighting and screening cannot fix polls that miss the Republicans who never answer pollsters.
Their wordsIt is entirely possible that the sort of republicans who do not answer pollster calls or texts are inherently different than the 1 in 1000 (or whatever) who do. Problem is you can't account for that with weighting or screening.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.