Read the piece on safeautonomy.blogspot.com ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsThey frame the situation as a choice between continued human drivers killing people (without statistical context) vs. immature robotaxis who don't drink and drive (but make other mistakes).
Their wordsIt is too early to know whether current robotaxi technology is safer than human drivers for fatalities.
Their wordsNon-autonomous technology (AEB) is making far more of a contribution right now -- but is missing from the false dilemma.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.