3 korrents from this piece
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsHigh-polluting industries benefit directly and obviously from the collapse of trust, shared reality and information quality.
Their wordsGenerative AI has no internal, designed momentum towards truth and accuracy (beyond the absurdly diminishing returns of energy-hungry multi-layered LLMs), but a person or an institution can (and should).
Our reading
Genuinely valuing truth, honesty and climate action logically entails opposing generative AI.
Their wordsBeing pro-correctness, anti-theft and anti-fossil fuels automatically places you in an aggressively anti-generative-AI position.