3 korrents from this piece
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsRedness is not "objective" in the sense of being "in the object", it only exists in the models generated by the sort of brains which are hooked up to eyes.
Their wordsThere is no "spooky free will" that violates the laws of physics in our common model of them, but the experience of free will certainly exists and is informative.
Our reading
It is unclear whether a digital emulation of a person could ever be conscious, even in principle.
Their wordsBut it is not clear at all that such a being could even exist in principle.