Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
Tablets will not replace desktop computers for complex, resource-intensive professional work.
Their wordsSo while iPadOS has obviously gotten more capable, I don't see it displacing the Mac desktop as the place where the heavy lifting gets done.
Their wordsThe bottom line is that one size does not fit all: we don't want a Mac that looks or works like a phone, tablet, watch, or TV.
Our reading
A major new interface redesign takes roughly a year of refinement before it looks presentable.
Their wordsLiquid Glass is currently in a barely presentable state on iOS. It's going to be like iOS 7 and take another year to sand down the rough edges.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.