korrents

korrents · piece

I asked Chat GPT to write a song in the style of Nick Cave and this is what it produced. What do you think?

Nick Cave · 16 Jan 2023

Others here said this too

What a generative model makes is a replication of art rather than art, because it can only imitate or average the choices human makers have already made.

Their wordsWhat ChatGPT is, in this instance, is replication as travesty. ChatGPT may be able to write a speech or an essay or a sermon or an obituary but it cannot create a genuine song.

Also said by Ted Chiang

Read the piece on theredhandfiles.com ↗

3 korrents from this piece ↓

Nick Cave did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Our reading

    What a generative model makes is a replication of art rather than art, because it can only imitate or average the choices human makers have already made.

    Their wordsWhat ChatGPT is, in this instance, is replication as travesty. ChatGPT may be able to write a speech or an essay or a sermon or an obituary but it cannot create a genuine song.

  2. Our reading

    Songs come out of suffering, and a system that has endured nothing has nothing to make one from.

    Their wordsSongs arise out of suffering, by which I mean they are predicated upon the complex, internal human struggle of creation and, well, as far as I know, algorithms don’t feel. Data doesn’t suffer.

  3. Our reading

    Making something great is the opposite of resembling what is already recognised as great.

    Their wordsWhat makes a great song great is not its close resemblance to a recognizable work. Writing a good song is not mimicry, or replication, or pastiche, it is the opposite.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.