korrents

korrents · piece

Have you heard? Clickhouse is winning the observability wars! <-- THIS IS SARCASM

Charity Majors · 8 Jul 2026

Read the piece on charity.wtf ↗

2 korrents from this piece ↓

Charity Majors did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Our reading

    In next-generation observability tools the data model is the real win, and the storage engine is what enables it.

    Their wordsBut the storage engine isn't the win. The data model is the win, and the storage engine is what enables it.

  2. Our reading

    One context-rich data set is worth more than the sum of its pillars, because relationships are what make data valuable, and splitting it into pillars destroys that value.

    Their wordsOne powerful, context rich data set is worth more than the sum of its pillars, because relationships are what makes data valuable. Slice it up into pillars, and you destroy that value for good.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.