Read the piece on caseyliss.com ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
Combine is a first-party, blessed, approved framework for reactive programming on Apple platforms.
Their wordsSo much of Combine is exactly what I've been hoping for: a first-party, blessed, approved, framework for reactive programming on Apple platforms.
Our reading
Combine's inclusion of typed errors and backpressure results in more robust code than RxSwift.
Their wordsCombine, by comparison, bakes both typed errors and backpressure in from the start. More bookkeeping, but more robust code.
Our reading
Their wordsI'd absolutely do all new development in SwiftUI and Combine going forward. It is clearly the future; embrace it.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.