Assessing Adaptive World Models in Machines with Novel Games (with 13 co-authors)
5 korrents from this paper
In plain words
People adapt fast by quickly building mental models of how new places work, yet AI checks only look at fixed knowledge from big training sets. This opens concrete tests of whether machines can figure out brand-new rules through limited play the way people do. It is a perspective proposing suites of games with genuine hidden novelty as benchmarks, drawing on cognitive science and pushing past static model evaluations.
Our summary of the paper, not the authors' words — written to be readable without the field's vocabulary, from the stored copy of the paper and nothing else. Drafted with xai:grok-4.5 and checked by a person. The authors' own sentences are the quotes below.
Near this, by wording
Papers whose claims are worded most like this one's, found by the same hourly pass that draws the map. It is a measure of LANGUAGE, not of agreement or of citation: two papers can be near each other here and flatly contradict one another.
François Chollet did not write this page.
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.