korrents

korrents · books

A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971)

John Rawls · c. 1971

Read the book on archive.org ↗

1 person recommends it, on rcmnd ↗

10 korrents from this book ↓

John Rawls did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this book, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The book prints chapter headings its extracted text does not preserve, so the claims below are in the book's order but not grouped. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust.
  2. Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override.
  3. Therefore in a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests.
  4. The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance.
  5. The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position.
  6. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts.
  7. First: each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.
  8. Being first virtues of human activities, truth and justice are uncompromising.
  9. Purity of heart, if one could attain it, would be to see clearly and to act with grace and self-command from this point of view.
  10. No one deserves his greater natural capacity nor merits a more favorable starting place in society.

Related books

Found from what the books talk about: claims worded alike in the archive's hourly pass, and subjects both are filed under. It is not a judgement that they agree — related books often argue the opposite. All books

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.